Branching out

One of the best things about the Men’s Movement is the sense of camaraderie one feels, the intellectual stimulation, and the opportunity to rise to a challenge every once in a while.We are a large group of people,but until now,we have traveled in small circles. I liken it to a group of young braves huddled around a campfire,listening to the village elders impart their wisdom. Our group is growing, and as we grow in size, we also grow in understanding of that wisdom. If we want to encourage that growth,some of us must ride out as apostles of the “received traditions of our people”.

We should aim to begin to make inroads into the mainstream.

Matthew 13:3-9

And he spake many things unto them in parables, saying, Behold, a sower went forth to sow;

And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up:

Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth:

And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away.

And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them:

But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold.

Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Such were the words of advice given in the bible for Apostles of the Christian faith. It is also good advice for the Apostles of our message. We must begin to find “good ground” for our “seed”. Misandry is ubiquitous,but like stony ground, it is softer in some places than others. Even a tiny crack is good enough for our message, for over time, the roots of our “seed” will split even rock solid misandry. We need to establish pockets of growth wherever possible. The number and kinds of places where this is possible might surprise you. Imagine, for instance, the amount of good that could be accomplished by encouraging the growth of anti-feminism in dating sites,marriage counseling sites, and the like, where men are already getting a bum deal but don’t understand WHY. We kill two birds with one stone, liberating men from these anti-male money sinkholes designed to exploit men’s fondness for the opposite sex,and attacking the enemy near strategic weak points.

These are not exactly mainstream venues, but strategic outposts where our message can filter into the mainstream.

Obviously, that means we must start slowly, moving toward the areas with more popular appeal from the areas with less. The idea is not to debate or explain our arguments, though we could if necessary, but to do as feminism does, merely assert our ideas as established and incontestable fact. This is how we sway the public to our side, we must make them believe they already agree with us. In order to do that, they must see our message everywhere they go.

So whenever possible, make or leave an MRA statement or meme everywhere YOU go,from bathrooms to boardrooms. No need to be overt,most men understand that marriage is a bad deal for us,simply remind them of it. Go forth like the Apostles and preach the “good news” that men are no longer obligated to honor or care for women. They wanted out of their traditional roles (ostensibly in order to be more equal to men, but actually in order to have their cake and eat it too, as can be seen today),that means we are also no longer bound by the rules of the former system. Like it says in the scripture I quoted,some people will hear you, and some will not. If a person or group of people will not listen to you, “shake off the dust of your feet” as a testament against them,i.e., walk away and put them out of your mind.

Let’s increase the scope of our operations as much as possible. I know it is like pushing a boulder up a hill. It is hard,but it is necessary, and like pushing a boulder up a hill, once we get to the top, the power will be on our side.

Take our “gospel” to the four corners of the earth,and when the time is right, we will strike, with the full force of the public on our side, a mighty death blow to feminism.

Into the fray once more

I’ve found a solution to my problem and I am back in business. I thought I would celebrate my return by sharing this great video by the venerable Bernard Chapin. It perfectly highlights the absurd hypocritical nature of feminists. DO check out the Jezebel article he links to and see what I mean.

A possible short break…..

Having some issues with my computer which might prevent me from posting for a couple of days. If so,I’ll spend my downtime doing research for more posts.

Obstacles to Progress

As the Men’s Rights Movement gains traction,our enemy will seek to break us up, impede our progress,and otherwise stop us from succeeding in our goals. There are a few time-tested strategies used by powerful groups to attack upstarts such as ourselves, and we need to be ready to counter them when they arise.

#1. Infiltration

This is probably already going on. Make no mistake, our enemy is salty. This is not their first ride on the political merry-go-round. They know these tactics well and have been using them for 50 years or more.

Infiltration is a common method of sabotage and it works like this:

A person joins a movement and studies their habits for a while, and then begins carping on a completely different side issue very vocally. Depending on the objective,which could range from distracting the group from more important issues to inciting them to commit illegal acts and endanger themselves, the carping could take many forms.

An example of this kind of unproductive carping in the MRM is the few people who steer every MRA discussion toward age of consent laws, and spend all their time moaning about how it’s unfair that they can’t fuck 14 year old girls and such.

First of all, if you’re like me, you couldn’t give a shit about age of consent laws when you could be sent to prison on a woman’s word alone that you raped her. Most people in the MRM are more concerned with the actual legal oppression of men.

I’m not saying that the guys who keep moaning about age of consent are saboteurs, hell, they may just be ephebophiles, but this kind of talk is counterproductive. It distracts us from more important issues like DV laws, rape laws, affirmative action laws, and anti-male hysteria in the media. THESE ISSUES MUST BE DEALT WITH FIRST,and they must be dealt with NOW. I cannot stress this strongly enough.

There is no way to counter this without harming the growth of our movement. If you see anyone doing this, attempt to steer the conversation back to more productive grounds and if this doesn’t work, disown the other person’s statement. Make it clear that you do not support the statement as an MRA. That is about all that we can do without handing out membership cards or some other identifying measure that would harm our disorganized resistance.

#2. Ridicule

Many MRA’s have seen the business end of this tactic, so I hope that you will trust me when I say that all of these tactics are part of a package, there actually is a playbook for breaking up groups of people,used by various agencies with three letter names all over the world. Ridicule is actually their number one tactic, but since we have mostly learned to counter it ourselves,I place it at number two in my list. It still poses a danger to us with respect to filling our ranks from the general public. They will keep trying to find ways to humiliate us until something works.

The best way to counter this is to learn to laugh at ourselves. If someone makes a joke at our expense, we need to grab the ball and run with it. Make the joke so over the top that (a.) everyone understands that we are not offended by it, and (b.) the joke is no longer funny. Since no one can top the joke we have made, people stop joking about us after having a couple of chuckles at our expense,we have “killed” the joke.

#3. Race/religion/what-have-you baiting

Infighting such as this will KILL the MRM. I have seen quite a bit of this going on lately, and I have been quite disturbed by the trend. Let me state this as clearly as I can: THERE IS NO GRIEVANCE YOU HAVE AGAINST ANOTHER RELIGION,RACE,OR CREED AS IMPORTANT AS THE FIGHT AGAINST FEMINISM!

“`Why have any men at all?’ wrote Sally Miller Gearhart in a 1982 manifesto titled `The Future–If There Is One–Is Female.’ Gearhart is an advocate of ovular merging, a process that involves the mating of two eggs, which has been successfully accomplished with mice. Only female offspring are produced. I’ve always worried that one day women would figure out how to get along without us and they would be able to reproduce unilaterally, like sponges. It’s not genocide, exactly. It’s more like job attrition, the way employers cut back positions without actually firing anyone. `A 75 per cent female to 25 percent male ratio could be achieved in one generation if one half of a population reproduced heterosexually and one half by ovular merging.’ according to Gearhart. `Such a prospect is attractive to women who feel that if they bear sons, no amount of love and care and non-sexist training will save those sons from culture where male violence is institutionalized.'”

Mary Daly, an important feminist academic, when asked what she thought of the idea (put forth by another feminist) that the male population should be reduced to cut down on violence, she responded: “I think it’s not a bad idea at all. If life is to survive on the planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males. People are afraid to say that kind of stuff anymore”.

Take a look at those quotes. IF YOU ARE A MAN,FEMINISTS WANT TO KILL YOU. That’s the good news. The “bad news” is that if we are not outright killed we will be castrated and used for manual labor.

Think I’m exaggerating? There are historical precedents for this. When Hitler carried out the Holocaust he took Jews apart as an assembly line process,stripping them first of their material possessions,shoes, clothes, gold teeth, then worked them nearly to death, and then killed them. Our enemy is just as devious, just as cold-blooded, and probably a thousand times more insane than Hitler ever thought about being. If their plans ever come to fruition,it will probably result in the extinction of the human species and they are joyfully marching arm in arm toward these goals. That’s how insane these people are.

There has never been a more important time for us to put aside our petty grievances and come together for the common good. They aren’t going to make an exception for you because you’re black, or you live in Thailand,or you’re a hermaphrodite with ambiguous genitalia and you only look like a man,or you love your mama,or you have 3 sisters,THEY ARE GOING TO FUCKING KILL YOU. They want all of us dead. ALL of us.

Do not respond to people carping on non-MRA issues. Note that infiltrators may also use these tactics as part of their infiltration and sabotage strategy. Do not allow them to divide us.

#4. Mischaracterization They are definitely already doing this. They hope to defeat us by painting us all as misogynists and tainting the public perception of our ideas and goals. The best way to counter this is to watch your mouth when speaking as an MRA. Do not give them fuel to add to the fire.

This is by no means a comprehensive list, this is merely a list of the most likely tactics of subversion to be used against us. Arm yourselves against our enemy,and prevail,my brothers.

Signing out.

Just a little kick….

America’s Funniest Home Videos made its living off of showing men getting hit in the balls. In the interest of equality between the sexes, I present to you:

Just a little kick

a little kickflip in the cunt

Feminism Is An Addiction

I have done a great bit of pondering on the subject,and I believe the early MRAs may have had a fundamentally-flawed understanding of feminism. I posit that the reason why we have made such surprising headway in the past few years is because younger MRAs have stumbled onto something the older MRAs were incapable of understanding. The early MRAs understood feminism to be a belief system, like a religion, with a set of doctrines that were (pardon the redundancy and this pun) religiously adhered to. Certainly, there is this aspect to feminism, but I do not believe that this approach can illuminate or entirely solve the problem.

Allow me to explain.

Religions, even when enforced by the state under penalty of death, fall out of favor, so too with political philosophies. Some religions have a long shelf life, but these religions are marked by strong Patriarchal headship. A female-centric religion will soon degenerate into meaningless hedonism (as opposed to the more meaningful kind, which I fully sanction), and so will one that is not sufficiently masculine, but nonetheless patriarchal in structure. We see that Christianity has been on a downward spiral for some time now, suffering from a lack of strong headship,the culprit being the idea that “we are all children of God” and “all are equal in Christ”. Only religions such as Judaism,which teach that woman is responsible for the fall of mankind,stand the test of time.

Examine the date of this quote,if you will.

“Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal, and it is useless to let go the reins and then expect her not to kick over the traces. You must keep her on a tight rein . . . Women want total freedom or rather – to call things by their names – total licence. If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. Once they have achieved equality, they will be your masters . . .” – Cato the Elder 234–149 B.C., quoted in Livy’s History of Rome

If feminism is a political or religious philosophy, then one would be forced to conclude that it is among the world’s oldest and most well-established. People usually spoke about what was generally accepted during Cato’s time, reasoning from the general to the specific, from the known to the unknown. We can safely assume that these uncomfortable truths about women had been part of the public discourse for some time at the time Livy’s History of Rome was written. I do not credit women with the ability to found a religious or political discipline and then maintain it over the course of several thousand years.

For one thing, where is the payoff? If they were smart enough to do all this, surely they must have had the forethought to realize that eventually men would revolt and put a stop to any system that seeks as its objective the domination and subjugation of men.

I don’t buy it.

Let me give you my theory.


If you have spent much time around drug addicts, and no doubt, some of you have, you will notice that they are busy people when it comes to their addiction. They are constantly coming up with different theories about how to hide or transport drugs,how to obtain drugs, who to sell drugs to, and of course, the best way to do drugs. Many times, their theories are a hodgepodge of science,pseudoscience, and what they’ve heard from their friends, and thus these theories are often wrong. These addicts’ entire lives revolve around their drug of choice, and if one were to review their income over the course of their lives, one would find that in some cases it can be substantial, even though the addict himself may live on the street corner or drift from place to place. Everything they take in they spend on more drugs to feed their addiction. They are driven to produce,often quite creatively, but everything they produce is used to purchase more drugs, usually causing wreckage in their social circles and families due to “creative liquidation” of other people’s property.

Let us study feminism,using this model.

As you can see, there are many parallels. Feminists take money from men via taxation and attempt to produce theories which denigrate those men in order to gain even more money,in order to expand even further,very much like a junkie searching for more dope each time to keep themselves high.Feminists take in quite a lot of money which they are not accountable for, and produce nothing of any value to anyone but themselves with it. Somehow,they are always in need of more cash.”For women and children”,of course. Feminists come up with lots of theories about the relations between the sexes, but they all basically revolve around one thing, themselves, and what men can do to feed their “habit” even further. This is a classic addiction pattern.

The “drugs” that feminists are addicted to (just like an individual woman) are money and status,and like a junkie they will do whatever they have to in order to obtain them. They will beg, they will steal, they will hurt other people, and probably even kill. This explains the existence of feminist prostitutes, proclaiming “death to the patriarchy” out of one side of their mouths, while spitting semen out of the other. The addiction takes precedence over everything, including consistency and logic.

Right now, what they have to do for money and status is to rob it from men,because we are the gatekeepers of money and status as women are the gatekeepers of sex and babies. This results in the curious phenomenon of women claiming “no man is entitled to sex” (a woman’s resource) while at the same time proclaiming “a woman is entitled to the same pay as men” (a man’s resource). Again, the addiction takes precedence.

But money and status themselves may be only part of the problem. It is conceivable that there are actual drugs involved here,but not of the illicit kind.

Oxytocin (pronounced /ˌɒksɨˈtoʊsɪn/) (sold as Pitocin, Syntocinon) is a mammalian hormone that acts primarily as a neurotransmitter in the brain. Also known as alpha-hypophamine (α–hypophamine), oxytocin has the distinction of being the very first polypeptide hormone to be sequenced and synthesized biochemically by Vincent du Vigneaud et al. in 1953.[1]

Oxytocin is best known for its roles in female reproduction: 1) it is released in large amounts after distension of the cervix and vagina during labor, and 2) after stimulation of the nipples, facilitating birth and breastfeeding. Recent studies have begun to investigate oxytocin’s role in various behaviors, including orgasm, social recognition, pair bonding, anxiety, and maternal behaviors.[2] For this reason, it is sometimes referred to as the “cuddle hormone.” [3]

From Wikipedia

A brain hormone that fosters fuzzy feelings between mothers and children may also goad soldiers to launch preemptive strikes in defense of their comrades, according to new research.

Oxytocin has received much attention for boosting social bonding and cooperation, but it also appears to trigger defensive aggression against outsiders who might threaten an individual’s social group, psychologists say. That indicates the hormone has a much more complex role in social dynamics than just encouraging humans to make love and not war.

“Our study shows that oxytocin not only plays a role in modulating cooperation and benevolence, but also in driving aggression,” said Carsten De Dreu, a social psychologist at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands.

From LiveScience

Dopamine has many functions in the brain, including important roles in behavior and cognition, voluntary movement, motivation, punishment and reward, inhibition of prolactin production (involved in lactation and sexual gratification), sleep, mood, attention, working memory, and learning. Dopaminergic neurons (i.e., neurons whose primary neurotransmitter is dopamine) are present chiefly in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of the midbrain, the substantia nigra pars compacta, and the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus.

It has been hypothesized that dopamine transmits reward prediction error, although this has been questioned.[6] According to this hypothesis, the phasic responses of dopamine neurons are observed when an unexpected reward is presented. These responses transfer to the onset of a conditioned stimulus after repeated pairings with the reward. Further, dopamine neurons are depressed when the expected reward is omitted. Thus, dopamine neurons seem to encode the prediction error of rewarding outcomes. In nature, we learn to repeat behaviors that lead to maximizing rewards. Dopamine is therefore believed to provide a teaching signal to parts of the brain responsible for acquiring new behavior. Temporal difference learning provides a computational model describing how the prediction error of dopamine neurons is used as a teaching signal.

The reward system in insects uses octopamine, which is the presumed arthropod homolog of norepinephrine,[7] rather than dopamine. In insects, dopamine acts instead as a punishment signal and is necessary to form aversive memories.[8][9]

-Wikipedia again

While I am not a scientist, it sounds plausible to me that a hormone,naturally created in women’s bodies, that leads to both pair-bonding and aggression could fuck with their brain chemistry enough to lead them to aggress against the one they are pair-bonded with or men in general occasionally. That would mean that,in a nutshell,feminism is an addiction to the kinds of thoughts and behaviors that are likely to produce these chemicals in their brains. The female addiction to chocolate is well documented,roughly twice as many women are common consumers of chocolate as men, and chocolate is known to produce these “love hormones” in the brain. Also, when women engage in emotional activities involving social interaction,it’s been shown to light up their brains like little fucking pinball machines, specifically the areas dealing with “rewards”. As you can see, women are indeed known to chase hormonal “highs”.

Feminism is a monkey on womens’ backs, and the best thing to do, the most humane thing to do, is to cold-turkey them.

In my life, I have never repented but of three things: that I trust a woman with a secret, that I went by sea when I might have gone by land, and that I passed a day with idleness.- Cato the Elder


Whilst slogging around the web today,I discovered that not only am I famous, some guy named Bubba has actually written a very nice sonnet in my ignoble honor. Thanks, Bubba, I’m touched. Here’s the link to it, I would post it here but it might be some kind of faux pas,considering I don’t know the dude. It’d be a shame if people stopped churning out tributes to my glory.

Keep ’em coming,Bubba, and you’ll be moving up in the Underworld.